Talk:OggMNG: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Martin.leese (talk | contribs) (Moved discussion from article to here) |
(copy APNG comment from the main page) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed in MNG and I would like that MNG stays MNG and doesn't change to APNG | :Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed in MNG and I would like that MNG stays MNG and doesn't change to APNG | ||
:In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things. | :In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things. | ||
On August 9, 2005, under ''Further Speculation'', Sayoshant wrote: | |||
:Some people, including staff members of Mozilla, believe MNG should be replaced by APNG, a superset extension of PNG with multi-image support, but that should still be backwards-compatibility. | |||
: | |||
:I, non-Xiph member, wonder on other hand if OggMNG should become OggAPNG or actually keep the project as MNG. | |||
Revision as of 18:10, 13 February 2008
On January 29, 2008, under Implementation Notes, Xpete wrote:
- Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed in MNG and I would like that MNG stays MNG and doesn't change to APNG
- In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things.
On August 9, 2005, under Further Speculation, Sayoshant wrote:
- Some people, including staff members of Mozilla, believe MNG should be replaced by APNG, a superset extension of PNG with multi-image support, but that should still be backwards-compatibility.
- I, non-Xiph member, wonder on other hand if OggMNG should become OggAPNG or actually keep the project as MNG.