User talk:DOS386: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(not OGG)
Line 6: Line 6:


What then ? ;-) [[User:DOS386|DOS386]] 14:46, 19 October 2007 (PDT)
What then ? ;-) [[User:DOS386|DOS386]] 14:46, 19 October 2007 (PDT)
:Ogg is not an acronym and should not be treated as such.  When talking about Ogg files, as in content inside the container, you should refer to it as either Ogg Video, Ogg Audio, or Ogg Application.  When you see someone saying "OGG", they usually mean Vorbis, so you see, you should avoid using those terms because it reveals ignorance for Ogg is not Vorbis, and Vorbis is not Ogg, although Vorbis does show up inside Ogg frequently.--[[User:Saoshyant|Ivo]] 06:49, 20 October 2007 (PDT)

Revision as of 05:49, 20 October 2007

For the last time, it is not "OGG". Please stop that. It causes a lot of problems. Please don't stop contributing, however. We appreciate your help.--Ivo 17:41, 7 August 2007 (PDT)

not OGG

> it is not "OGG". Please stop that. It causes a lot of problems.

What then ? ;-) DOS386 14:46, 19 October 2007 (PDT)

Ogg is not an acronym and should not be treated as such. When talking about Ogg files, as in content inside the container, you should refer to it as either Ogg Video, Ogg Audio, or Ogg Application. When you see someone saying "OGG", they usually mean Vorbis, so you see, you should avoid using those terms because it reveals ignorance for Ogg is not Vorbis, and Vorbis is not Ogg, although Vorbis does show up inside Ogg frequently.--Ivo 06:49, 20 October 2007 (PDT)