Icebreaker::UserWantedFeatures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I added some things i would think that would be cool :)) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== List of features | == List of features requested by Users == | ||
=== GUI === | === GUI === | ||
Revision as of 01:30, 14 July 2007
List of features requested by Users
GUI
I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface. I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat.
Compatibility
I don't know a lot about the internals from icecast and the like, but it would be really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder. (have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/) I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality. Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if that is in your interest.
I/O
- XSPF playlist output format by default - Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org) compatibility => XSPF as input format
- generation of xml config file for Ices
Scheduling
- hourly news / logo / commercial support - scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...)