MonthlyMeeting200512: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(More under OggPCM)
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Agenda ==
== Agenda ==


* Address wiki spam (Spambots are now the most active "contributors")
* Address wiki spam ([[:Category:Spambots|Spambot]]s are now the most active "contributors")
** Use norefer on links to make it less attractive? (default in [[Special:Version|newer]] MediaWiki)
** Use norefer on links to make it less attractive? (default in [[Special:Version|newer]] MediaWiki)
** More conter-measures? (e.g. delete accounts or auto-revert changes by identified spambots)
** More conter-measures? (e.g. delete accounts or auto-revert changes by identified spambots)
** Or why not merely install a [[Wikipedia:CAPTCHA|CAPTCHA]] hack for MediaWiki (the software for this wiki)?
** Or why not merely install a [[Wikipedia:CAPTCHA|CAPTCHA]] hack for MediaWiki (the software for this wiki)?


* OggPCM and more
* [[OggPCM]] and more
** The whole debate has exposed the fact that there is no decision making authority at the moment
** The whole debate has exposed the fact that there is no decision making authority at the moment
*** Some people have suggested creating a "steering committee" below the current board
*** Some people have suggested creating a "steering committee" below the current board
Line 12: Line 12:
** Some decision has to be made (in the shorter term) as to what version of OggPCM to adopt.
** Some decision has to be made (in the shorter term) as to what version of OggPCM to adopt.


* The new speex.org site is ready, but someone (with permissions) needs to "install" it instead of the old one.
* The new [http://speex.org speex.org] site is ready, but someone (with permissions) needs to "install" it instead of the old one.


* Vorbis stills need more support on portable players. Shouldn't a team of Public Relations cover this issue by contacting as many player producer companies as possible?
* [[Vorbis]] stills need more support on portable players. Shouldn't a team of Public Relations cover this issue by contacting as many player producer companies as possible?

Revision as of 19:17, 1 December 2005

Agenda

  • Address wiki spam (Spambots are now the most active "contributors")
    • Use norefer on links to make it less attractive? (default in newer MediaWiki)
    • More conter-measures? (e.g. delete accounts or auto-revert changes by identified spambots)
    • Or why not merely install a CAPTCHA hack for MediaWiki (the software for this wiki)?
  • OggPCM and more
    • The whole debate has exposed the fact that there is no decision making authority at the moment
      • Some people have suggested creating a "steering committee" below the current board
    • Need a process to "approve" Xiph.Org codecs/standards
    • Some decision has to be made (in the shorter term) as to what version of OggPCM to adopt.
  • The new speex.org site is ready, but someone (with permissions) needs to "install" it instead of the old one.
  • Vorbis stills need more support on portable players. Shouldn't a team of Public Relations cover this issue by contacting as many player producer companies as possible?