CELT TODO: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Open issues == | == Open issues == | ||
* Reduce waste when splitting at high bit-rate? | * Reduce waste when splitting at high bit-rate? | ||
* fix start/end energy prediction | * fix start/end energy prediction | ||
* Revert N=1 allocation special case? | * Revert N=1 allocation special case? | ||
* Approximation for delta calculation | |||
* Revisit folding | * Revisit folding | ||
** Can we remove the need to fold on split? | ** Can we remove the need to fold on split? | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
** Band-aligned folding? | ** Band-aligned folding? | ||
* Still possible, but probably not a good idea | |||
** Enable new layout with more HF bands | |||
** Remove 2-phase stereo? | |||
* Tuning (nothing that really needs fixing, but it's still open) | * Tuning (nothing that really needs fixing, but it's still open) | ||
Revision as of 08:28, 11 January 2011
Open issues
- Reduce waste when splitting at high bit-rate?
- fix start/end energy prediction
- Revert N=1 allocation special case?
- Approximation for delta calculation
- Revisit folding
- Can we remove the need to fold on split?
- Should we do L/R folding?
- Should we fold the side (probably not)?
- Band-aligned folding?
- Still possible, but probably not a good idea
- Enable new layout with more HF bands
- Remove 2-phase stereo?
- Tuning (nothing that really needs fixing, but it's still open)
- Temporal masking
- Band layout (spacing)
- qtheta offset
- delta allocation
- fine offset
- Spreading/folding parameter