CELT TODO: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
== Open issues ==
== Open issues ==


* Code
* Enable new layout with more HF bands?
** Laplacian energy encoding
* Prevent errors at very low bit-rates
** Variable spreading decision in the encoder
* Reduce waste when splitting at high bit-rate?
* Remove 2-phase stereo?
* fix start/end energy prediction
* Revert N=1 allocation special case?
* Revisit folding
** Can we remove the need to fold on split?
** Should we do L/R splitting?
** Should we fold the side (probably not)?
** Band-aligned folding?


* Tuning
* Tuning
Line 16: Line 24:
*** energy prediction parameters (means, decay)
*** energy prediction parameters (means, decay)
** Spreading/folding parameter
** Spreading/folding parameter
== Other decisions to make ==
* What should we do about remaining bits after the last PVQ?
** more fine energy?
** encode bands backward?
** allow "fractional pulses"
* Minimise bits left after PVQ
** Reverse band ordering?
** Fractional pulses?
* Dynamic allocation
** Include a way to deviate from the normal bit allocation?

Revision as of 10:01, 30 December 2010

Open issues

  • Enable new layout with more HF bands?
  • Prevent errors at very low bit-rates
  • Reduce waste when splitting at high bit-rate?
  • Remove 2-phase stereo?
  • fix start/end energy prediction
  • Revert N=1 allocation special case?
  • Revisit folding
    • Can we remove the need to fold on split?
    • Should we do L/R splitting?
    • Should we fold the side (probably not)?
    • Band-aligned folding?
  • Tuning
    • Band layout (spacing)
    • TF resolution options
    • Bit allocation
      • Main table
      • Stereo
      • qtheta offset (all 3 modes)
      • delta allocation (all 3)
      • fine offset
      • energy prediction parameters (means, decay)
    • Spreading/folding parameter
Retrieved from "https://wiki.xiph.org/index.php?title=CELT_TODO&oldid=12698"