Nut Container: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (cleanup) |
(death) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page collects opinions about the | This page collects opinions about the NUT container format. | ||
* dead page: http://www.nut-container.org/ | |||
* http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=NUT | |||
* http://ffmpeg.org/~michael/nut.txt | |||
== Comparison with Ogg == | == Comparison with Ogg == | ||
Revision as of 07:50, 11 March 2012
This page collects opinions about the NUT container format.
- dead page: http://www.nut-container.org/
- http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=NUT
- http://ffmpeg.org/~michael/nut.txt
Comparison with Ogg
Monty writes: "NUT is very similar to Ogg (at least when compared to the other contemporary systems). It draws the abstraction lines in different places but has roughly the same functionality and hits the same practical limitations when considered in a system more complex than a desktop video player.
"Nor can we take lightly the prospect of abandoning a hundred million installed copies of Ogg (including those in hardware) for no distinct practical benefit."