Talk:OggMNG: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(copy APNG comment from the main page) |
m (added to dicussion) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
On January 29, 2008, under ''Implementation Notes'', Xpete wrote: | On January 29, 2008, under ''Implementation Notes'', Xpete wrote: | ||
:Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed | :Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed | ||
:In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things. | :In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things. | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
: | : | ||
:I, non-Xiph member, wonder on other hand if OggMNG should become OggAPNG or actually keep the project as MNG. | :I, non-Xiph member, wonder on other hand if OggMNG should become OggAPNG or actually keep the project as MNG. | ||
:: Keep it as mng because apng and mng are NOT THE SAME things: | |||
:: mng >>>http://www.libpng.org/pub/mng/ | |||
:: apng >>>http://animatedpng.com/ | |||
Revision as of 09:18, 14 February 2008
On January 29, 2008, under Implementation Notes, Xpete wrote:
- Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed
- In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things.
On August 9, 2005, under Further Speculation, Sayoshant wrote:
- Some people, including staff members of Mozilla, believe MNG should be replaced by APNG, a superset extension of PNG with multi-image support, but that should still be backwards-compatibility.
- I, non-Xiph member, wonder on other hand if OggMNG should become OggAPNG or actually keep the project as MNG.
- Keep it as mng because apng and mng are NOT THE SAME things:
- mng >>>http://www.libpng.org/pub/mng/
- apng >>>http://animatedpng.com/