XSPF v1 Notes and Errata: Difference between revisions
m (typo fix) |
|||
Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
== URI RFC used == | == URI RFC used == | ||
The XSPF v1 specification mentions RFC 2396 when talking about URIs. As [http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/2007Jul/0001.html asking on uri@w3.org] revealed, we should have referred to ''STD 66'' instead which stands for ''"latest RFC of URI"'' (RFC 3986 for today, 2007-07-09). What does that mean practically? | |||
This means: | |||
* You can use IPv6 host part URIs in XSPF v1 | |||
* You can use a RFC 3986 parser for your XSPF v1 implementation | |||
= Errata = | = Errata = |
Revision as of 17:06, 8 July 2007
This page lists errata of the XSPF version 1 document and also gives advice on using and understanding XSPF.
Notes
<trackList> and <trackNum> spelling
Please note that trackList and trackNum elements MUST NOT be written in all lowercase since XSPF is case-sensitive. These two are the only elements containing capital letters so just remember trackList and trackNum and your XSPF will be fine.
Absolute vs. relative URIs in key attibutes
The attributes rel (<meta> and <link>) and application (<extension>) are by XSPF v1 specification allowed to hold relative URIs. For example this meta element is legal in XSPF v1:
<meta rel="playCount">14</meta>
While this might look elegant it comes with several drawbacks:
- You might easily forget that this string is a URI and include non-URI characters like spaces by mistake (e.g. rel="play count" is not valid)
- You lose the namespace concept: nobody will know what or whom this key belongs to or came from
For these reasons it is strongly recommended to use absolute URIs as keys instead:
<meta rel="http://example.com/track/meta/playCount/1/0/">14</meta>
Version information in key attributes
When defining you own extensions to XSPF you will have to choose an application URI for your onw extensions:
<extension application="http://example.com/myext/"> .. </extension>
Please consider including version information in your application URIs and increase it whenever the structure of your extension changes:
<extension application="http://example.com/xspf/track/1/0/"> .. </extension>
This enables others to properly distinct different versions of your extensions without the need to do version guessing. Adding version information to rel of <meta> and <link> is a good idea as well:
<meta rel="http://example.com/track/meta/playCount/1/0/">14</meta>
Element order
In XSPF child elements can appear in any order. That means that for example both these tracks are valid for XSPF v1.
As appearing in the specification:
<track> <creator>Creator first</creator> <album>Album after</album> </track>
Also valid:
<track> <album>Album first</album> <creator>Creator after</creator> </track>
This is not mentioned in the specification and might have been ignored by some implementations. Thus for people implementing XSPF support that means:
- XSPF readers must be able to deal with arbitrary element order
- XSPF writers should always produce XSPF files with elements in the order appearing in the specification for maximum compatibility.
To save you extracting this information yourself the order of elements appearing in the XSPF specification is:
- playlist
- playlist.title
- playlist.creator
- playlist.annotation
- playlist.info
- playlist.location
- playlist.identifier
- playlist.image
- playlist.date
- playlist.license
- playlist.attribution
- playlist.attribution.location
- playlist.attribution.identifier
- playlist.link
- playlist.meta
- playlist.extension
- playlist.trackList
- playlist.trackList.track
- playlist.trackList.track.location
- playlist.trackList.track.identifier
- playlist.trackList.track.title
- playlist.trackList.track.creator
- playlist.trackList.track.annotation
- playlist.trackList.track.info
- playlist.trackList.track.image
- playlist.trackList.track.album
- playlist.trackList.track.trackNum
- playlist.trackList.track.duration
- playlist.trackList.track.link
- playlist.trackList.track.meta
- playlist.trackList.track.extension
Whitespace
Whitespace handling in XML can be a little difficult to understand at first. Since XSPF is based on XML, people implementing XSPF readers or writers do have to know about the basics of whitespace handling in XSPF. The good things is we summed it up here to make things easier for you.
Ignore in non-leaf elements
Whitespace in elements only holding child elements but no text must be ignored.
Elements affected:
- playlist
- playlist.attribution
- playlist.trackList
- playlist.trackList.track
Process in non-string leaf elements
In XSPF all elements with non-string content (i.e. of type dateTime, nonNegativeInteger, or anyURI) must be process with the "collapse" method. Sounds difficult but is easy:
- Leading and trailing whitespace ('\t'(0x08), '\n'(0x0a), '\r'(0x0d), ' '(0x20)) is removed
- Whitespace "in the middle" is converted to a single space (think s/[\t\n\r ]+/ / Perl people)
For example the three-line text
ABC DEF GHI
will become
ABC GHI DEF
Elements affected:
- playlist.attribution.identifier
- playlist.attribution.location
- playlist.date
- playlist.identifier
- playlist.image
- playlist.info
- playlist.license
- playlist.link
- playlist.location
- playlist.meta
- playlist.trackList.track.duration
- playlist.trackList.track.identifier
- playlist.trackList.track.image
- playlist.trackList.track.info
- playlist.trackList.track.link
- playlist.trackList.track.location
- playlist.trackList.track.meta
- playlist.trackList.track.trackNum
Keep in "real" string leaf elements
Whitespace in string elements is significant and has to be preserved. So if <annotation> contains line feeds the annotation text really spans several lines:
<annotation>Line feeds and even spaces are preserved. This example annotation spans two lines</annotation>
Elements affected:
- playlist.annotation
- playlist.creator
- playlist.title
- playlist.trackList.track.album
- playlist.trackList.track.annotation
- playlist.trackList.track.creator
- playlist.trackList.track.title
Do X in Extensions
Whitespace handling inside of extension elements depends on the specific extension.
Elements affected:
- playlist.extension
- playlist.trackList.track.extension
URI RFC used
The XSPF v1 specification mentions RFC 2396 when talking about URIs. As asking on uri@w3.org revealed, we should have referred to STD 66 instead which stands for "latest RFC of URI" (RFC 3986 for today, 2007-07-09). What does that mean practically?
This means:
- You can use IPv6 host part URIs in XSPF v1
- You can use a RFC 3986 parser for your XSPF v1 implementation
Errata
4.1.1.2.12.2 content
This paragraph describes the content of playlist.meta. It also reads "xspf:playlist elements MAY contain exactly one" which does not make sense for the content of an element and can be safely ignored.
4.1.1.2.14.1.1.1.12.2 content
This paragraph describes the content of playlist.trackList.track.meta. It also reads "xspf:playlist elements MAY contain exactly one" which does not make sense for the content of an element and can be safely ignored.