User:Lucas gonze: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Lucas gonze (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
Lucas gonze (talk | contribs) mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
# Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF group and Xiph group committing to? | # Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF group and Xiph group committing to? | ||
## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look | ## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..." | ||
at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..." | ## what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003? | ||
## talk to Xiph lawyer? | |||
# Point xspf.org to Xiph server. | # Point xspf.org to Xiph server. | ||
## Change look to use xiph style? | |||
# Finish moving source control to svn at Xiph. | # Finish moving source control to svn at Xiph. | ||
# Move the mailing list? How to do that without affect Musicbrainz.org? | # Move the mailing list? How to do that without affect Musicbrainz.org? | ||
# Press release similar to PR on FLAC arrangement. Jack Moffit? | |||
Revision as of 19:15, 22 February 2005
This page is for work on moving the XSPF project to a new home at Xiph.
Todo list:
- Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF group and Xiph group committing to?
- commitment to open/royalty-free
DanBri suggests:
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..." - what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
- talk to Xiph lawyer?
- commitment to open/royalty-free
- Point xspf.org to Xiph server.
- Change look to use xiph style?
- Finish moving source control to svn at Xiph.
- Move the mailing list? How to do that without affect Musicbrainz.org?
- Press release similar to PR on FLAC arrangement. Jack Moffit?