Talk:Ghost: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added question, subject) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Will this be a lossy or lossless codec or will it be able to do both? == | == Will this be a lossy or lossless codec or will it be able to do both? == | ||
== Ghost is also a bad name !! == | |||
People might think it's for security because of Norton ghost and what about the file extension? | |||
.ghost is already used, please be a little bit more creative and unique | |||
A unique codecs deserves a name that rises it apart from a number of other things. | |||
Please add something that reveals that ghost is for audio like: | |||
Audioghost or Soundghost | |||
And also think of a good file extension and MIME-type right away. | |||
Latest revision as of 10:25, 2 February 2008
Will this be a lossy or lossless codec or will it be able to do both?
Ghost is also a bad name !!
People might think it's for security because of Norton ghost and what about the file extension? .ghost is already used, please be a little bit more creative and unique A unique codecs deserves a name that rises it apart from a number of other things.
Please add something that reveals that ghost is for audio like: Audioghost or Soundghost And also think of a good file extension and MIME-type right away.