Talk:Ambisonics: Difference between revisions
Martin.leese (talk | contribs) m (→References: Typo) |
Martin.leese (talk | contribs) m (→Not for Delete: Formatting) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Not for Delete == | == Not for Delete == | ||
| Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST) | Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST) | ||
: I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT) | |||
Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. [[User:Martin.leese|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT) | |||
== Resources == | == Resources == | ||
Latest revision as of 06:43, 10 April 2012
Not for Delete
I deleted the {{delete}} template, so thought I had better explain why. I have joined this Wiki because it looks like you guys have an interest in Ambisonics. I can help with this. However, I need you to tell me what you are looking for from Ambisonics. For the moment, I have listed some resources on Ambisonics, and included a short discussion on how the Ogg formats could improve on the ".amb" and ".uhj" specifications.
Ambisonics is mentioned on the OggPCM page, and I have made some minor edits to that page.
Please let me know what else would be useful to you. Martin Leese 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)
- I believe the {{delete}} template used on a discussion page indicates only that discussion page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. Imalone 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)
Actually, both the article and Talk page had the {{delete}} template on them. I deleted both {{delete}}s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. Martin Leese 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)
Resources
Hey, Martin.
I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--Saoshyant 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)