MonthlyMeeting200603: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(sketch an agenda) |
(→Agenda) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
= Agenda = | = Agenda = | ||
* Project status reports | * Project status reports | ||
* Monty's new job | * Monty's new job | ||
* Should we incorporate Skeleton in our tools by default? (tabled from..december?) | * Should we incorporate Skeleton in our tools by default? (tabled from..december?) | ||
* Any news on [http://trac.xiph.org/cgi-bin/trac.cgi/ticket/736 incorrect channel order in oggenc/oggdec]? Updated audio.c and audio.h files from John Edwards are in oggenc2.81 ([http://www.rarewares.org/files/ogg/oggenc2.81srcs.zip source]). Also, what about merging the full oggenc2.81 and oggdec 1.9.2 ([http://www.rarewares.org/files/ogg/oggdecV1.9.2src.zip source]) in the standard xiph.org versions, so also we linux users can use these new advanced features ? [tabled from last month] | |||
* Latest [http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ aoTuV Vorbis Encoders] have received lot of [http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/VorbisEncoders testing vs. the original xiph.org encoder] from the community and are considered a lot better. Since there is also a [http://wiki.xiph.org/index.php/Bounties Bounty for "Aggressive low-bitrate libvorbis encoding improvements for Vorbis I"], how about merging it in the official encoder? [tabled from last month] | |||
* Is there any interest in extending vcedit/libvorbisfile to do basic handling of Vorbis streams from concurrently multiplexed Ogg? | |||
Latest revision as of 00:39, 1 March 2006
This meeting will be at 18h00 GMT 2006 March 1 in #xiphmeet on irc.freenode.net
Agenda
- Project status reports
- Monty's new job
- Should we incorporate Skeleton in our tools by default? (tabled from..december?)
- Any news on incorrect channel order in oggenc/oggdec? Updated audio.c and audio.h files from John Edwards are in oggenc2.81 (source). Also, what about merging the full oggenc2.81 and oggdec 1.9.2 (source) in the standard xiph.org versions, so also we linux users can use these new advanced features ? [tabled from last month]
- Latest aoTuV Vorbis Encoders have received lot of testing vs. the original xiph.org encoder from the community and are considered a lot better. Since there is also a Bounty for "Aggressive low-bitrate libvorbis encoding improvements for Vorbis I", how about merging it in the official encoder? [tabled from last month]
- Is there any interest in extending vcedit/libvorbisfile to do basic handling of Vorbis streams from concurrently multiplexed Ogg?