XSPF Todo list: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (rv spam) |
No edit summary |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
# Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the [[XSPF]] and Xiph people committing to? | {{historical}} | ||
# Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the [[XSPF]] and [[Xiph.org Foundation|Xiph.org]] people committing to? | |||
## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..." | ## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..." | ||
### see | ### see [http://svn.xiph.org/trunk/theora/LICENSE theora] notice for something similar in a xiph project. | ||
## what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003? | ## what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003? | ||
## talk to Xiph lawyer? | ## talk to Xiph lawyer? | ||
Line 9: | Line 10: | ||
## can either side back out later? | ## can either side back out later? | ||
## read the 501c and other legal documents | ## read the 501c and other legal documents | ||
# Move wiki | # Move wiki | ||
## pointer on the old wiki to the new one | ## pointer on the old wiki to the new one | ||
## freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one? | ## freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one? | ||
Latest revision as of 20:52, 3 February 2008
- Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF and Xiph.org people committing to?
- commitment to open/royalty-free
DanBri suggests:
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."- see theora notice for something similar in a xiph project.
- what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
- talk to Xiph lawyer?
- who owns XSPF copyrights and trademark?
- have each contributor sign something like http://copylaw.com/forms/copyassn.html
- add a copyright notice to each file
- can either side back out later?
- read the 501c and other legal documents
- commitment to open/royalty-free
- Move wiki
- pointer on the old wiki to the new one
- freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one?