Icebreaker::UserWantedFeatures: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
Martin.leese (talk | contribs) m (→Compatibility: icecast => Icecast + tidy) |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== List of features | {{historical}} | ||
== List of features requested by Users == | |||
=== GUI === | |||
I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface. | |||
I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat. | |||
=== Compatibility === | |||
I don't know a lot about the internals from Icecast and the like, but it would be really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder. (Have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/) I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality. | |||
Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if that is in your interest. | |||
=== I/O === | === I/O === | ||
| Line 12: | Line 24: | ||
- hourly news / logo / commercial support | - hourly news / logo / commercial support | ||
- scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...) | - scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...) | ||
[[Category:Icebreaker]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 19 February 2016
List of features requested by Users
GUI
I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface. I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat.
Compatibility
I don't know a lot about the internals from Icecast and the like, but it would be really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder. (Have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/) I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality.
Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if that is in your interest.
I/O
- XSPF playlist output format by default - Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org) compatibility => XSPF as input format
- generation of xml config file for Ices
Scheduling
- hourly news / logo / commercial support - scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...)