Nut Container: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(death) |
Martin.leese (talk | contribs) m (Removed SPAM link) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page collects opinions about the NUT container format. | This page collects opinions about the NUT container format. | ||
* http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=NUT | * http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=NUT | ||
* http://ffmpeg.org/~michael/nut.txt | * http://ffmpeg.org/~michael/nut.txt | ||
* http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/NUT_Container NUT at French Wikipedia | |||
== Comparison with Ogg == | == Comparison with Ogg == | ||
Latest revision as of 10:55, 11 March 2012
This page collects opinions about the NUT container format.
- http://wiki.multimedia.cx/index.php?title=NUT
- http://ffmpeg.org/~michael/nut.txt
- http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/NUT_Container NUT at French Wikipedia
Comparison with Ogg
Monty writes: "NUT is very similar to Ogg (at least when compared to the other contemporary systems). It draws the abstraction lines in different places but has roughly the same functionality and hits the same practical limitations when considered in a system more complex than a desktop video player.
"Nor can we take lightly the prospect of abandoning a hundred million installed copies of Ogg (including those in hardware) for no distinct practical benefit."