Talk:OggMNG: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added to dicussion) |
Martin.leese (talk | contribs) m (Put back attribution) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
On January 29, 2008, under ''Implementation Notes'', Xpete wrote: | On January 29, 2008, under ''Implementation Notes'', [[UserXpete:Xpete]] wrote: | ||
:Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed | :Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed | ||
:In a presentation, you can also just pause the video for showing things. | :In a presentation, you can also just pause the presentation, video for showing things. | ||
On August 9, 2005, under ''Further Speculation'', Sayoshant wrote: | On August 9, 2005, under ''Further Speculation'', Sayoshant wrote: | ||
Latest revision as of 05:04, 24 August 2009
On January 29, 2008, under Implementation Notes, UserXpete:Xpete wrote:
- Because of OggSpots, an extra presentational format for presentation slide-like stuff isn't needed
- In a presentation, you can also just pause the presentation, video for showing things.
On August 9, 2005, under Further Speculation, Sayoshant wrote:
- Some people, including staff members of Mozilla, believe MNG should be replaced by APNG, a superset extension of PNG with multi-image support, but that should still be backwards-compatibility.
- I, non-Xiph member, wonder on other hand if OggMNG should become OggAPNG or actually keep the project as MNG.
- Keep it as mng because apng and mng are NOT THE SAME things:
- mng >>>http://www.libpng.org/pub/mng/
- apng >>>http://animatedpng.com/