Search results

Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • ...that the sources for libFLAC and libFLAC++ are available under The New BSD license and the sources for flac and metaflac applications, and the plugins are ava FLAC compiles on many platforms: most Unices (including Linux, *BSD, Solaris, and Mac OS X), DOS, Windows, BeOS, and OS/2. There are build syst ...
    5 KB (707 words) - 03:20, 22 June 2016
  • == License == === Under what license is Speex released? === ...
    10 KB (1,653 words) - 08:02, 9 November 2017
  • * Changes under suitable license for re-integration with Xiph.Org libvorbis * All work submitted must be licenced under a BSD style licence (excepting circumstances where other licences may conflict) ...
    4 KB (696 words) - 03:30, 28 November 2017
  • ==== What Open Source Initiative approved license(s) does your project use? ==== In general, we use the revised 3-clause BSD license for our libraries, to enable the widest possible uses of our formats and re ...
    20 KB (3,270 words) - 23:42, 19 February 2015
  • : '''Xiph does not require implementors to acquire any license before implementing the specification. Therefore, we do not have a definit : '''Yes. libtheora is made available under a permissive BSD-like license. Its open-source nature also contributes to its quality as a reference imp ...
    29 KB (4,300 words) - 16:31, 6 December 2009
  • ...ference implementation are both available under '''[https://opus-codec.org/license/ liberal, royalty-free licenses]'''.<br /> ...ftware) is permitted, provided that some basic conditions specified in the license are met. ...
    29 KB (4,851 words) - 10:57, 3 October 2020