Difference between revisions of "Talk:Field names"

From XiphWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(comment on proposal:Picard Tag mapping)
 
m (Added attribution + section heading)
Line 1: Line 1:
Hi, you should also consider the tag mapping used by Picard (the Musicbrainz tagger), although Picard isnt as popular as some taggers files tagged with this tagger are tagged comprehensively due to the data-richness of the Musicbrainz database.
+
== Picard ==
  
http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/PicardQt/TagMapping
+
Hi, you should also consider the tag mapping used by Picard (the Musicbrainz tagger), although Picard isnt as popular as some taggers files tagged with this tagger are tagged comprehensively due to the data-richness of the Musicbrainz database.[http://wiki.musicbrainz.org/PicardQt/TagMapping]
 
+
In particular note Picard already uses:
+
  
 +
In particular note Picard already uses:
 +
<pre>
 
COMPOSER
 
COMPOSER
 
TRACKTOTAL
 
TRACKTOTAL
 
DISCNUMBER
 
DISCNUMBER
 
DISCTOTAL
 
DISCTOTAL
 
+
</pre>
but uses  
+
but uses:
 
+
<pre>
 
ENCODEDBY not ENCODED-BY
 
ENCODEDBY not ENCODED-BY
 
BARCODE  not PRODUCTNUMBER
 
BARCODE  not PRODUCTNUMBER
 +
</pre>
 +
[[User:Ijabz|Ijabz]] 9 November 2009

Revision as of 08:19, 9 November 2009

Picard

Hi, you should also consider the tag mapping used by Picard (the Musicbrainz tagger), although Picard isnt as popular as some taggers files tagged with this tagger are tagged comprehensively due to the data-richness of the Musicbrainz database.[1]

In particular note Picard already uses:

COMPOSER
TRACKTOTAL
DISCNUMBER
DISCTOTAL

but uses:

ENCODEDBY not ENCODED-BY
BARCODE   not PRODUCTNUMBER

Ijabz 9 November 2009