RFC 3533 Errata: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
(added two new errata)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 5: Line 5:
'''Title'''
'''Title'''


It should be simply "The Ogg Encapsulation Format".  The last bit certainly doesn't build trust on Ogg.
It should be simply "The Ogg Encapsulation Format".  The last bit certainly doesn't build trust on Ogg. [I disagree; Silvia]


'''Category'''
'''Category'''


It should NOT be Informational but Standards Track.
It should NOT be Informational but Standards Track. [This is not possible because it is not a standard developed by the IETF. It will only go on Standards Track if it comes out of an IETF working group.; Silvia]


'''Section 4, paragraph 4'''
'''Section 4, paragraph 4'''
Line 16: Line 16:
per logical bitstream." should read "It also uses two additional header packets
per logical bitstream." should read "It also uses two additional header packets
per logical bitstream.
per logical bitstream.
'''non-decreasing granulepos'''
The RFC needs to specify non-decreasing granulepos - see discussion at https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1306.
'''incomplete packets on the e_o_s page of a logical bitstream'''
The RFC needs to clarify that incomplete packets on the e_o_s page of a logical bitstream are undesired and will be ignored - see discussion at https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1308.


== Additions ==
== Additions ==
Line 24: Line 32:


* how to deal with large pagerate differentials?
* how to deal with large pagerate differentials?
[[Category:Ogg]]

Latest revision as of 17:12, 25 February 2008

This is the official errata page for RFC 3533 "The Ogg Encapsulation Format Version 0".

Errata

Title

It should be simply "The Ogg Encapsulation Format". The last bit certainly doesn't build trust on Ogg. [I disagree; Silvia]

Category

It should NOT be Informational but Standards Track. [This is not possible because it is not a standard developed by the IETF. It will only go on Standards Track if it comes out of an IETF working group.; Silvia]

Section 4, paragraph 4

The sentence "It also uses two additional header pages per logical bitstream." should read "It also uses two additional header packets per logical bitstream.

non-decreasing granulepos

The RFC needs to specify non-decreasing granulepos - see discussion at https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1306.

incomplete packets on the e_o_s page of a logical bitstream

The RFC needs to clarify that incomplete packets on the e_o_s page of a logical bitstream are undesired and will be ignored - see discussion at https://trac.xiph.org/ticket/1308.

Additions

Ideas for new stuff in 3533bis:

  • the multiplexing should be rewritten, in particular to give a seek algorithm
  • how to deal with large pagerate differentials?