Difference between revisions of "Nut Container"

From XiphWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (NutIssues moved to Nut issues)
m (cleanup)
Line 4: Line 4:
 
== Comparison with Ogg ==
 
== Comparison with Ogg ==
  
Monty writes: "NUT is very similar to Ogg (at
+
Monty writes: "NUT is very similar to [[Ogg]] (at least when compared to the other contemporary systems).  It draws the abstraction lines in different places but has roughly the same functionality and hits the same practical limitations when considered in a system more complex than a desktop video player.
least when compared to the other contemporary systems).  It draws the
 
abstraction lines in different places but has roughly the same
 
functionality and hits the same practical limitations when considered
 
in a system more complex than a desktop video player.
 
  
"Nor can we take
+
"Nor can we take lightly the prospect of abandoning a hundred million installed copies of Ogg (including those in hardware) for no distinct practical benefit."
lightly the prospect of abandoning a hundred million installed copies
 
of Ogg (including those in hardware) for no distinct practical
 
benefit."
 

Revision as of 14:01, 6 July 2008

This page collects opinions about the NUT container format.

Comparison with Ogg

Monty writes: "NUT is very similar to Ogg (at least when compared to the other contemporary systems). It draws the abstraction lines in different places but has roughly the same functionality and hits the same practical limitations when considered in a system more complex than a desktop video player.

"Nor can we take lightly the prospect of abandoning a hundred million installed copies of Ogg (including those in hardware) for no distinct practical benefit."