XSPF Todo list: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(I think that means using the Xiph page headers and stuff which is also the case already) |
(loving no longer planned. see vorbis-dev archive of today.) |
||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
## can either side back out later? | ## can either side back out later? | ||
## read the 501c and other legal documents | ## read the 501c and other legal documents | ||
# Move wiki | # Move wiki | ||
## pointer on the old wiki to the new one | ## pointer on the old wiki to the new one | ||
## freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one? | ## freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one? | ||
Revision as of 16:39, 28 September 2007
- Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF and Xiph.org people committing to?
- commitment to open/royalty-free
DanBri suggests:
"http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."- see theora notice for something similar in a xiph project.
- what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
- talk to Xiph lawyer?
- who owns XSPF copyrights and trademark?
- have each contributor sign something like http://copylaw.com/forms/copyassn.html
- add a copyright notice to each file
- can either side back out later?
- read the 501c and other legal documents
- commitment to open/royalty-free
- Move wiki
- pointer on the old wiki to the new one
- freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one?