XSPF Todo list: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 20:52, 3 February 2008

This page is inactive and is kept primarily for historical interest.

Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF and Xiph.org people committing to?
1. commitment to open/royalty-free
  DanBri suggests:
  "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."
  1. see theora notice for something similar in a xiph project.
2. what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
3. talk to Xiph lawyer?
4. who owns XSPF copyrights and trademark?
  1. have each contributor sign something like http://copylaw.com/forms/copyassn.html
  2. add a copyright notice to each file
5. can either side back out later?
6. read the 501c and other legal documents
Move wiki
1. pointer on the old wiki to the new one
2. freeze the old wiki to be sure that people use this one?

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{historical}}
 # Due diligence on legal agreement.  What exactly are the [[XSPF]] and [[Xiph.org Foundation|Xiph.org]] people committing to?
 ## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look  at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."