Vorbis Encoders: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<div id="nolabel" style="overflow:auto;height:1px;">
== Vorbis-OptSort ==
[http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dungeon/6809/vorbis-optsort-en.html Vorbis-OptSort] improves source code of the Vorbis codec library (libvorbis-1.0) to accelerate encoding time about 10% (not apply clean on 1.1.2).


== AoTuV ==
[http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/ AoTuV encoders] are optimized encoders for higher quality.
* AoTuV beta2 was adopted as a part of Vorbis 1.1 of Xiph.Org.
* AoTuV beta4 improved quality at all bitrates (versus xiph.org 1.1.2) and can also go down to 32 Kb/s (q-2). Note that this patch also include the [http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Dungeon/6809/vorbis-optsort-en.html Vorbis-OptSort] patch.
* The latest release is AoTuV beta 4.51, which improves quality at q<3 (versus AoTuV beta4).
* The latest [http://www.geocities.jp/aoyoume/aotuv/test.html test release] is aoTuV pre-beta5 [20060321].
Quality test of AoTuV beta4 vs. libvorbis 1.1.1:
* [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=35438 80Kbps comparison of many audio codec and libvorbis 1.1.1 vs. AoTuV beta4]
** libvorbis 1.1.1 ABR vs libvorbis 1.1.1 VBR vs AoTuV beta4 VBR summary:
:: http://audiotests.free.fr/tests/2005.07/80/80TEST_PLOTS_04.png


[http://www.action-meds.com cheap butalbital]
  "  on group1, all encoders are tied (although aoTuV is better than 1.1.1
[http://www.5stardrugs.com buy tramadol]
  with 90% confidence). It’s a disappointment for me, because I’ve seriously
[http://www.24-7pills.net tramadol online]
  expected from aoTuV to reduce the level of coarseness/fatness on this specific
[http://www.american-meds.net butalbital discount]
  musical genre. However, slight improvements were often perceptible – it’s
[http://www.amazing-pills.com butalbital cheap]
  better than nothing. With some samples, a slight regression was also perceptible:
buy tramadol online. online tramadol from our pharmacy, taking tramadol buy information tramadol, side effects tramadol, purchase tramadol online. cod online tramadol, tramadol india, cheap tramadol online, tramadol online, pharmacy online store
  additional distortion or apparently restrictive lowpass (noticed with harpsichord).
tramadol 50 mg. low price tramadol, tramadol pain treatment - tramadol hcl 50? - 120 tramadol. tramadol sales, buying cod tramado l, tramadol for humans, cheap tramadol online, overdose tramadol. order tramadol pictured tramadol pill tramadol seizure. cod tramadol cod, tramadol pdr, order pharmacy tramadol. buy prescription tramadol drug tramadol - tramadol side.
  Interesting to note that ABR doesn’t perform badly, except on critical samples
is tramadol a, order tramadol online, tramadol hcl, tramadol drug test .tramadol uses order tramadol overnight paypal tramadol
  (bitrate stayed at ~85 kbps when VBR encodings reached 160!); ABR also sounded a
tramadol com tramadol tablets tramadol no perscription remove tramadol.
  bit better with some samples (tonal one). Good point to ABR (just note that encoding
[http://20six.co.uk/cheaptramadol cheap tramadol]
  speed is dramatically slow compared to VBR).
[http://20six.co.uk/ordertramadol order tramadol]
    on group 2, differences are much more defined. ABR appeared as clearly worse than
[http://20six.co.uk/onlinetramadol1 online tramadol]
  VBR and aoTuV beta 4 outdid 1.1.1 on VBR mode. Obviously, the changes Aoyumi made on
[http://20six.co.uk/tramadolonline tramadol online]
  vorbis are much more effective on various music.
[http://20six.co.uk/tramadoldiscount tramadol discount]
    on average, aoTuV beta 4 was better than 1.1.1 (not a surprise I would say)."
[http://20six.co.uk/purchasetramadol purchase tramadol]
[http://20six.co.uk/ordersoma order soma]
[http://20six.co.uk/onlinesoma1 online soma]
[http://20six.co.uk/online-viagra online viagea]
[http://20six.co.uk/orderviagra order viagra]
[http://20six.co.uk/cheapviagraonline cheap viagra online]
[http://20six.co.uk/purchaseviagra purchase viagra]
[http://20six.co.uk/cheap-ultram cheap ultram]


[http://spaces.msn.com/cheap-tramadol/ cheap tramadol]
  "Vorbis (aoTuV beta 4, VBR –q 0,9): this is by far the most
[http://spaces.msn.com/buy-viagra/ buy viagra]
  enjoying thing I’ve heard at this bitrate. I was highly surprised
  by results I’ve got with the 150 classical samples; I was literally
  astonished by the final score obtained with the 35 remaining samples!
  Vorbis is obviously an amazing tool at this bitrate." guruboolez


SEO: UndoneHeaven
* [http://forum.hardware.fr/hardwarefr/VideoSon/MP3-WMA-AAC-OGG-qualite-kbps-evaluation-sujet-84950-1.htm 96Kbps comparison of many audio codec and libvorbis 1.1.1 vs. AoTuV beta4 (french)]
** [http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fforum.hardware.fr%2Fhardwarefr%2FVideoSon%2FMP3-WMA-AAC-OGG-qualite-kbps-evaluation-sujet-84950-1.htm&langpair=fr%7Cen&hl=it&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools  Google traduction]
** libvorbis 1.1.1 vs AoTuV beta4 summary:
:: http://audiotests.free.fr/tests/2005.07/96/96TEST_PLOTS_04.png
* [http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=36465 180Kbps comparison of many audio codec on classical music]
: Comment on AoTuV beta 4:
  "Vorbis: Vorbis is now –thanks to Aoyumi– an excellent audio format for 180
  kbps encodings (and classical music). It has apparently no flaws (lowest note
  was 3.5) but only minor problems audible from time to time: additional noise,
  fatness, or softened details. One third of the tested samples are transparent
  to my ears with aoTuV encodings. My own limits are close to be reached."
    guruboolez


[http://www.replicahours.com rolex replica]
  "Vorbis: Vorbis is now impressive. Last year constant noise boost or coarseness
[http://www.replicahours.com/index.php?cPath=51_25 fake rolex daydate]
  spoiled the performance of this format. I was surprised to hear those problems
[http://www.replicahours.com/index.php?cPath=29 replica swiss]
  on –q6,00 setting supposed to be free of them due to lossless coupling. Aoyumi has
[http://www.google.com/search?sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&ie=UTF-8&q=replicahours replicahours]
  apparently identifies precisely the cause of this problem and he worked to solve it.
buy replica cheap best price rolex discounf fake. watches fake watch online store using paypal fedex rolex replicahours. order rolex replica now. cheap wholesale fake rolex online free shipping. 80% discount rolex replica and replicas watches. woman how to adjust a chronometer watch authorized rolex dealer, rolex watches rolex dial rolex oyster perpetual date reloj panerai replica en usa rolex watches serial numbers rolex woman daytona daytona watch replica panerai watch rolex 50th anniversary rolex daytona paul newman replica rolex buy rolex watches. ladies rolex yachtmaster white dial faux. rolex daytona manual cellini rolex for sale pictures of rolex oyster perpetual datejust rolex rolex gmt-master ii buying rolex on line fake rolex daytona gold on silver how to tell fake tag rolex oyster perpetual new tell. Replica rolex? Swiss made replica rolex watch! Cost does fake much rolex rolex presidential rolex. Rolex dials rolex sea dweller. Rolex  tudor fake rolex turkey datejust oyster perpetual rolex man rolex submariner cosmograph daytona oyster professional rolex? Datejust rolex rolex replica rolex fake rolexes for sale. Rolex submariner for sale, rolex yachtmaster! Explorer ii rolex preowned rolex watch? Cheap rolex watch, rolex daytona 116520 forum rolex. 18k gold replica ex part rolex daytona review rolex submariner 50 anniversary rolex cellini replica rolex watch fake rolex omega?
  Not entirely though: some remaining trails are still audible with few samples but
  the intensity is now really frail (at least on the tested samples). Other artifacts
  are also corrected: micro-attacks on Orion_II (sample 09) are now much less dusty
  (aoTuV performed even better than any other tested format at this bitrate!). Performance
  are remarkable and the slightly gain in bitrate consumption is the icing on the cake.
  Just a question: Does aoTuV mean Tuned for Victory? Or Tuned by Visitors? From what
  planet is Aoyumi coming from? By the way, I wouldn’t say anymore than Vorbis is not
  mature enough. At least not for classical, which appeared to be a weak point for this format"
    guruboolez


[http://www.customsoftwarenow.com custom software development]
== Optimized Ogg Vorbis Encoders ==
Software Development, custom software development, offshore  software development, outsourcing software development
These encoders are highly optimized encoders developed by the Ogg Vorbis Acceleration Project that are much faster than the standard builds with negligible to no effects on audio quality.
 
* [http://homepage3.nifty.com/blacksword/index.htm Home page (Japan)]
[http://www.thepublish.com press release]
* [http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fhomepage3.nifty.com%2Fblacksword%2Findex.htm&langpair=ja%7Cen&hl=it&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&prev=%2Flanguage_tools Home Page (google traduction)]
press release, articles, business directory, ezines, classifieds, job search,business free  b2b search advertising aerospace defense agriculture airlines automotive chemicals computers electronics semiconductors energy utilities
* [http://homepage3.nifty.com/blacksword/index_e.htm Home Page (English, not up to date)]
 
[http://www.ez-agents.com wholesale atv]
</div>

Revision as of 02:54, 8 July 2006

Vorbis-OptSort

Vorbis-OptSort improves source code of the Vorbis codec library (libvorbis-1.0) to accelerate encoding time about 10% (not apply clean on 1.1.2).

AoTuV

AoTuV encoders are optimized encoders for higher quality.

  • AoTuV beta2 was adopted as a part of Vorbis 1.1 of Xiph.Org.
  • AoTuV beta4 improved quality at all bitrates (versus xiph.org 1.1.2) and can also go down to 32 Kb/s (q-2). Note that this patch also include the Vorbis-OptSort patch.
  • The latest release is AoTuV beta 4.51, which improves quality at q<3 (versus AoTuV beta4).
  • The latest test release is aoTuV pre-beta5 [20060321].

Quality test of AoTuV beta4 vs. libvorbis 1.1.1:

http://audiotests.free.fr/tests/2005.07/80/80TEST_PLOTS_04.png
 "  on group1, all encoders are tied (although aoTuV is better than 1.1.1
 with 90% confidence). It’s a disappointment for me, because I’ve seriously
 expected from aoTuV to reduce the level of coarseness/fatness on this specific
 musical genre. However, slight improvements were often perceptible – it’s
 better than nothing. With some samples, a slight regression was also perceptible:
 additional distortion or apparently restrictive lowpass (noticed with harpsichord).
 Interesting to note that ABR doesn’t perform badly, except on critical samples
 (bitrate stayed at ~85 kbps when VBR encodings reached 160!); ABR also sounded a
 bit better with some samples (tonal one). Good point to ABR (just note that encoding
 speed is dramatically slow compared to VBR).
   on group 2, differences are much more defined. ABR appeared as clearly worse than
 VBR and aoTuV beta 4 outdid 1.1.1 on VBR mode. Obviously, the changes Aoyumi made on
 vorbis are much more effective on various music.
   on average, aoTuV beta 4 was better than 1.1.1 (not a surprise I would say)."
 "Vorbis (aoTuV beta 4, VBR –q 0,9): this is by far the most
 enjoying thing I’ve heard at this bitrate. I was highly surprised
 by results I’ve got with the 150 classical samples; I was literally
 astonished by the final score obtained with the 35 remaining samples!
 Vorbis is obviously an amazing tool at this bitrate." guruboolez
http://audiotests.free.fr/tests/2005.07/96/96TEST_PLOTS_04.png
Comment on AoTuV beta 4:
 "Vorbis: Vorbis is now –thanks to Aoyumi– an excellent audio format for 180
 kbps encodings (and classical music). It has apparently no flaws (lowest note
 was 3.5) but only minor problems audible from time to time: additional noise,
 fatness, or softened details. One third of the tested samples are transparent
 to my ears with aoTuV encodings. My own limits are close to be reached."
   guruboolez
 "Vorbis: Vorbis is now impressive. Last year constant noise boost or coarseness
 spoiled the performance of this format. I was surprised to hear those problems
 on –q6,00 setting supposed to be free of them due to lossless coupling. Aoyumi has
 apparently identifies precisely the cause of this problem and he worked to solve it.
 Not entirely though: some remaining trails are still audible with few samples but
 the intensity is now really frail (at least on the tested samples). Other artifacts
 are also corrected: micro-attacks on Orion_II (sample 09) are now much less dusty
 (aoTuV performed even better than any other tested format at this bitrate!). Performance
 are remarkable and the slightly gain in bitrate consumption is the icing on the cake.
 Just a question: Does aoTuV mean Tuned for Victory? Or Tuned by Visitors? From what
 planet is Aoyumi coming from? By the way, I wouldn’t say anymore than Vorbis is not
 mature enough. At least not for classical, which appeared to be a weak point for this format"
   guruboolez

Optimized Ogg Vorbis Encoders

These encoders are highly optimized encoders developed by the Ogg Vorbis Acceleration Project that are much faster than the standard builds with negligible to no effects on audio quality.