Talk:Ghost: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(added question, subject)
 
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Will this be a lossy or lossless codec or will it be able to do both? ==
== Will this be a lossy or lossless codec or will it be able to do both? ==
== Ghost is also a bad name !! ==
People might think it's for security because of Norton ghost and what about the file extension?
.ghost is already used, please be a little bit more creative and unique
A unique codecs deserves a name that rises it apart from a number of other things.
Please add something that reveals that ghost is for audio like:
Audioghost or Soundghost
And also think of a good file extension and MIME-type right away.

Latest revision as of 11:25, 2 February 2008

Will this be a lossy or lossless codec or will it be able to do both?

Ghost is also a bad name !!

People might think it's for security because of Norton ghost and what about the file extension? .ghost is already used, please be a little bit more creative and unique A unique codecs deserves a name that rises it apart from a number of other things.

Please add something that reveals that ghost is for audio like: Audioghost or Soundghost And also think of a good file extension and MIME-type right away.