Talk:Ambisonics - Revision history

Martin.leese: /* Not for Delete */ Formatting

2012-04-10T14:43:06Z

Not for Delete: Formatting

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 10 April 2012
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)		Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)

	I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)		: I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

	:Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)		Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

Martin.leese: /* Not for Delete */

2007-03-28T05:33:58Z

Not for Delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 28 March 2007
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)		I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

	:Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)		:Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

Martin.leese: /* Not for Delete */

2007-03-28T05:23:44Z

Not for Delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:23, 28 March 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)		I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

			:Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

Imalone at 12:34, 27 March 2007

2007-03-27T12:34:26Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:34, 27 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:

	== Not for Delete ==		== Not for Delete ==

Line 17:		Line 16:

	Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)		Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)

			I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone\|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)

	== Resources ==		== Resources ==

Martin.leese: /* References */ Typo

2007-03-03T21:45:52Z

References: Typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:45, 3 March 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:
	Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)		Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)

	== ~~References~~ ==		== Resources ==

	Hey, Martin.		Hey, Martin.

	I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)		I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)

Martin.leese: /* References */

2007-03-02T17:29:23Z

References

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:29, 2 March 2007
Line 20:		Line 20:
	== References ==		== References ==

	:Hey, Martin.		Hey, Martin.

	:I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)		I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)

Martin.leese at 17:28, 2 March 2007

2007-03-02T17:28:57Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:28, 2 March 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:


	== Not for Delete ==		== Not for Delete ==
Line 18:		Line 17:

	Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)		Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)

			== References ==

	:Hey, Martin.		:Hey, Martin.

	:I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)		:I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)

Saoshyant: /* Not for Delete */

2007-03-02T14:42:27Z

Not for Delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 2 March 2007
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)		Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)

			:Hey, Martin.

			:I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)

Martin.leese: /* Not for Delete */

2007-02-05T23:00:22Z

Not for Delete

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:00, 5 February 2007
Line 9:		Line 9:
	some resources on Ambisonics, and included a short discussion on how the Ogg		some resources on Ambisonics, and included a short discussion on how the Ogg
	formats could improve on the		formats could improve on the
	[http://www.ambisonicbootlegs.net/Members/mleese/file-format-for-b-format/ ".amb" ~~specification~~].		[http://www.ambisonicbootlegs.net/Members/mleese/file-format-for-b-format/ ".amb"]
			and
			[http://www.ambisonicbootlegs.net/Members/mleese/file-format-for-uhj/ ".uhj"]
			specifications.

	Ambisonics is mentioned on the [[OggPCM]] page, and I have made some minor		Ambisonics is mentioned on the [[OggPCM]] page, and I have made some minor

Martin.leese: Not for Delete

2007-01-28T06:14:24Z

Not for Delete

← Older revision	Revision as of 06:14, 28 January 2007
Line 1:	Line 1:


		== Not for Delete ==

		I deleted the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template, so thought I had better
		explain why. I have joined this Wiki because it looks like you guys have an
		interest in Ambisonics. I can help with this. However, I need you to tell
		me what you are looking for from Ambisonics. For the moment, I have listed
		some resources on Ambisonics, and included a short discussion on how the Ogg
		formats could improve on the
		[http://www.ambisonicbootlegs.net/Members/mleese/file-format-for-b-format/ ".amb" specification].

		Ambisonics is mentioned on the [[OggPCM]] page, and I have made some minor
		edits to that page.

		Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)