https://wiki.xiph.org/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=139.30.17.116&feedformat=atomXiphWiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-29T10:32:59ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.40.1https://wiki.xiph.org/index.php?title=Talk:Vorbis_Hardware&diff=606Talk:Vorbis Hardware2004-11-11T07:19:30Z<p>139.30.17.116: regular expression check to prevent spam is too hard!!</p>
<hr />
<div>http://web.archive.org/web/20040208141117/http://wiki.xiph.org/VorbisHardware/editform<br />
<br />
Follow the link above to get a less outdate cache.<br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Some stats to write down in here:<br />
The new VorbisHardware Wiki has been up since 16:29, 27 Aug 2004. Now, one month later this site had more than 4600 visits (grabbed from counter on the bottom).<br />
The page is 8.5 screen units to scroll on my 1024px high monitor. Time to reconsider a split of contents as mentioned above?<br />
--[[User:Bodo|Bodo]] 14:49, 29 Sep 2004 (PDT)<br />
<br />
== Page split ==<br />
<br />
Hi, anyone else thinks the [[VorbisHardware]] page could be splitted into 4...6 sub pages in order to structure the growing content?<br />
<br />
What about <br />
* portable hardware players<br />
* static hardware players<br />
* third party software in hardware <br />
* Projects<br />
* Embedded<br />
<br />
?? Comments, please!<br />
<br />
---<br />
<br />
Now that new Vorbis gadget seem to come in on a weekly basis,<br />
I agree that a page split is inevitable. --ingmar<br />
<br />
<br />
== Spam problem ==<br />
<br />
Guys, these outrageous spam attacks have to stop! It is always the same IP ranges 60.25.x.x. Is there a way to block updates from such IPs in MediaWiki ?<br />
<br />
Lately there seems to be some regular expression checks before a post is allowed. It seems that also the term "com" is blocked. How are we supposed links to companies if "com" is forbidden ? Also I can't access the site anymore with my beloved Opera, and it takes ages with other browsers. Is this related somehow ?<br />
<br />
== product description scheme ==<br />
<br />
Could we also agree on a scheme how and what information about products is posted ? Current scheme is mostly ok, but there are some crappy entries. I'd keep company name first, linked to international company site -- it's confusing if it is used to directly link to the product in question.<br />
<br />
Then follow the unlinked names of the products. In the text itself the product names should be linked to their respective sites. Also a short discription of other features would be nice, not just 'supports vorbis'. Then about third party links: only one review per product should be linked, extra photo links and other bullcrap can be skipped. Maybe some firmware links if necessary. <br />
<br />
Ingmar (updatemeister)<br />
<br />
Forgot: entries should be sorted alphabetically.<br />
<br />
== Other comments ==<br />
<br />
Anyone know anything about Frontierlabs and the NEX ia? I have emailed their techsupport numerous times, to try and find out how they are progressing with their Ogg support (if at all), but have never received a reply...</div>139.30.17.116