Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

Talk:Vorbis Hardware

1,442 bytes added, 11:25, 2 October 2008
Vorbis encoder location
--[[User:Bodo|Bodo]] 14:49, 29 Sep 2004 (PDT)
== Page split product description scheme ==
HiCould we also agree on a scheme how and what information about products is posted ? Current scheme is mostly ok, anyone else thinks the [[VorbisHardware]] page could be splitted into 4but there are some crappy entries...6 sub pages in order I'd keep company name first, linked to international company site -- it's confusing if it is used to directly link to structure the growing content?product in question.
What Then follow the unlinked names of the products. In the text itself the product names should be linked to their respective sites. Also a short discription of other features would be nice, not just 'supports vorbis'. Then about * portable hardware players* static hardware players* third party software in hardware * Projects* Embeddedlinks: only one review per product should be linked, extra photo links and other bullcrap can be skipped. Maybe some firmware links if necessary.
?? Comments, please!Ingmar (updatemeister)
---Forgot: entries should be sorted alphabetically.
Now that new Vorbis gadget seem to come in on a weekly basis,I agree that a page split is inevitable. --ingmar== Other comments ==
Anyone know anything about Frontierlabs and the NEX ia? I have emailed their techsupport numerous times, to try and find out how they are progressing with their Ogg support (if at all), but have never received a reply...
:They used to say they were working on it (for the Nex II) but they stopped answering. That was a couple years ago. I don't think they'll ever support Ogg on the Nexia. Sorry. It's a nice player in other regards, though behind the times in terms of hardware performance. It gets about 10 hours of playtime (mp3) on two AA cells where other players get more time than that on one AAA cell.
== Spam problem == Guys, these outrageous spam attacks have to stop! It is always the same IP ranges 60.25.x.x. Is there a way to block updates from such IPs in MediaWiki ? == product description scheme Vorbis encoder location ==
Could we also agree on I added a scheme how link to VLSI Solution's VS1053, which is capable of both encoding and what information about products is posted ? Current scheme is mostly ok, but there are some crappy entriesdecoding Ogg Vorbis with a 16-bit DSP. As far as I'd keep company name first, linked to international company site -- it's confusing if it know this is used to directly link to a somewhat unique feature and I thought of bumping the product in questionreference up.
Then follow However, as I am affiliated with the unlinked names company, I feel a conflict of the productsinterests, so I will not do that. In the text itself the product names should be linked But just in case some of you more independent people think hardware Ogg Vorbis encoders are interesting enough, I wanted to their respective sites. Also raise a short discription of other features discussion whether it would be niceok to move the VS1053 to a more visible position on this page, not just 'supports vorbis'e.g. creating subheadings like "Ogg Vorbis Encoders" / "Ogg Vorbis Decoders" or similar. Then about third party links: only one review per product should be linkedAgain, extra photo links and other bullcrap can be skipped. Maybe some firmware links if necessaryI will not do that personally.
Ingmar (updatemeisterI have no idea whether raising this question in itself is a violation of something. I don't think so, but if I'm wrong, please just delete this discussion point.)
Forgot: entries should be sorted alphabetically.- RealLeo
== Other comments ==:Raising the question is not a violation of anything. While the feature seems pretty interestiing, and we'd like to know what other HW encoders are there, I do not think a single product justifies making a whole section. For now, at least.--[[User:Saoshyant|Ivo]] 10:42, 13 September 2007 (PDT)
Anyone know anything about Frontierlabs and the NEX ia? :I have emailed their techsupport numerous timesnow moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to try and find out how they are progressing be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with their Ogg support the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if at all)you think my reasoning really stinks, but have never received a reply..feel free to undo my changes.[[User:RealLeo|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)
3
edits

Navigation menu