XSPF Todo list: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
 
mNo edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
# Due diligence on legal agreement.  What exactly are the XSPF group and Xiph group committing to?
# Due diligence on legal agreement.  What exactly are the [[XSPF]] and Xiph people committing to?
## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look  at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."
## commitment to open/royalty-free<br>DanBri suggests:<br> "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look  at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."
## what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
## what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
Line 5: Line 5:
## who owns XSPF copyrights and trademark?   
## who owns XSPF copyrights and trademark?   
## can either side back out later?
## can either side back out later?
## read the 501c and other legal documents
# Point xspf.org to Xiph server.
# Point xspf.org to Xiph server.
## Xiph admin to initiate transfer, Rob Kaye to confirm it.
## Xiph admin to initiate transfer, Rob Kaye to confirm it.

Revision as of 21:15, 22 February 2005

  1. Due diligence on legal agreement. What exactly are the XSPF and Xiph people committing to?
    1. commitment to open/royalty-free
      DanBri suggests:
      "http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/#sec-Requirements It would be re-assuring if Xiph would explicitly (re)confirm their commitment to open, royalty-free standards in this area. From a look at the Xiph site, I'd guess that shouldn't be a problem..."
    2. what was the arrangement between FLAC and Xiph when they did a similar thing in 2003?
    3. talk to Xiph lawyer?
    4. who owns XSPF copyrights and trademark?
    5. can either side back out later?
    6. read the 501c and other legal documents
  2. Point xspf.org to Xiph server.
    1. Xiph admin to initiate transfer, Rob Kaye to confirm it.
    2. Change look to use xiph style?
  3. Finish moving source control to svn at Xiph.
  4. Move the mailing list? How to do that without affect Musicbrainz.org?
  5. Press release similar to 2003 press release for FLAC arrangement. Jack Moffit?
  6. Introduce XSPF and Xiph people -- get together at monthly meeting? First wednesday of the month, #xiphmeet, 12GMT odd months 23:59 GMT even months.