Talk:Vorbis Hardware - Revision history

Videticj: /* Vorbis encoder location */

2008-10-02T18:25:04Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:25, 2 October 2008
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)		:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)
-
-	RealLeo: I'm trying to do a streaming audio link using the VS1053 and found the encode->transmit->decode lag to be about 700ms. Is it possible to decrease the Ogg packet size to decrease the streaming latency? Thanks!--[[User:Videticj\|Videticj]]

Saoshyant: /* Vorbis encoder location */

2008-08-26T20:17:31Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:17, 26 August 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)		:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)

-	- RealLeo: I'm trying to do a streaming audio link using the VS1053 and found the encode->transmit->decode lag to be about 700ms.	+	RealLeo: I'm trying to do a streaming audio link using the VS1053 and found the encode->transmit->decode lag to be about 700ms. Is it possible to decrease the Ogg packet size to decrease the streaming latency? Thanks!--[[User:Videticj\|Videticj]]
-	Is it possible to decrease the Ogg packet size to decrease the streaming latency? Thanks!	+

Videticj: /* Vorbis encoder location */

2008-08-26T18:50:25Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 26 August 2008
Line 39:		Line 39:
	:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)		:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)

-	- RealLeo: I'm trying to do a streaming audio link using the VS1053 and found the encode->transmit->decode lag to be about 700ms. Is it possible to decrease the Ogg packet size to decrease the streaming latency? Thanks!	+	- RealLeo: I'm trying to do a streaming audio link using the VS1053 and found the encode->transmit->decode lag to be about 700ms.
		+	Is it possible to decrease the Ogg packet size to decrease the streaming latency? Thanks!

Videticj: /* Vorbis encoder location */

2008-08-26T18:49:54Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:49, 26 August 2008
Line 38:		Line 38:

	:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)		:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)
		+
		+	- RealLeo: I'm trying to do a streaming audio link using the VS1053 and found the encode->transmit->decode lag to be about 700ms. Is it possible to decrease the Ogg packet size to decrease the streaming latency? Thanks!

Pmsyyz: Talk:VorbisHardware moved to Talk:Vorbis Hardware

2008-07-06T22:04:48Z

Talk:VorbisHardware moved to Talk:Vorbis Hardware

← Older revision

Revision as of 22:04, 6 July 2008

RealLeo: /* Vorbis encoder location */

2007-12-04T09:51:28Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:51, 4 December 2007
Line 36:		Line 36:

	:Raising the question is not a violation of anything. While the feature seems pretty interestiing, and we'd like to know what other HW encoders are there, I do not think a single product justifies making a whole section. For now, at least.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Ivo]] 10:42, 13 September 2007 (PDT)		:Raising the question is not a violation of anything. While the feature seems pretty interestiing, and we'd like to know what other HW encoders are there, I do not think a single product justifies making a whole section. For now, at least.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Ivo]] 10:42, 13 September 2007 (PDT)
		+
		+	:I have now moved VLSI Solution's Ogg Vorbis chips to the top of the list. My rationale is that the VS1053 is the only Ogg Vorbis encoder of the whole group, so I felt this to be OK now that the encoder has been officially released. However, I _am_ still affiliated with the company (read: I wrote the encoder and I am very proud of it), so if you think my reasoning really stinks, feel free to undo my changes. [[User:RealLeo\|RealLeo]] 01:51, 4 December 2007 (PST)

Saoshyant: /* Vorbis encoder location */

2007-09-13T17:42:25Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:42, 13 September 2007
Line 34:		Line 34:

	- RealLeo		- RealLeo
		+
		+	:Raising the question is not a violation of anything. While the feature seems pretty interestiing, and we'd like to know what other HW encoders are there, I do not think a single product justifies making a whole section. For now, at least.--[[User:Saoshyant\|Ivo]] 10:42, 13 September 2007 (PDT)

RealLeo: Cleared suggestion

2007-09-13T17:00:47Z

Cleared suggestion

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 13 September 2007
Line 27:		Line 27:
	== Vorbis encoder location ==		== Vorbis encoder location ==

-	I added a link to VLSI Solution's VS1053, which is capable of both encoding and decoding Ogg Vorbis with a 16-bit DSP. As far as I know this is a somewhat unique feature and I thought of bumping the on reference up.	+	I added a link to VLSI Solution's VS1053, which is capable of both encoding and decoding Ogg Vorbis with a 16-bit DSP. As far as I know this is a somewhat unique feature and I thought of bumping the reference up.

-	However, as I am affiliated with the company, I feel a conflict of interests, so I will not do that. But just in case some of you more independent people think hardware Ogg Vorbis encoders are interesting enough, I wanted to raise a discussion whether it would be ok to move the VS1053 to a more visible position on this page. Again, I will not do that personally.	+	However, as I am affiliated with the company, I feel a conflict of interests, so I will not do that. But just in case some of you more independent people think hardware Ogg Vorbis encoders are interesting enough, I wanted to raise a discussion whether it would be ok to move the VS1053 to a more visible position on this page, e.g. creating subheadings like "Ogg Vorbis Encoders" / "Ogg Vorbis Decoders" or similar. Again, I will not do that personally.

	(I have no idea whether raising this question in itself is a violation of something. I don't think so, but if I'm wrong, please just delete this discussion point.)		(I have no idea whether raising this question in itself is a violation of something. I don't think so, but if I'm wrong, please just delete this discussion point.)
		+
		+	- RealLeo

RealLeo: Vorbis encoder location

2007-09-13T16:58:38Z

Vorbis encoder location

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:58, 13 September 2007
Line 24:		Line 24:
	Anyone know anything about Frontierlabs and the NEX ia? I have emailed their techsupport numerous times, to try and find out how they are progressing with their Ogg support (if at all), but have never received a reply...		Anyone know anything about Frontierlabs and the NEX ia? I have emailed their techsupport numerous times, to try and find out how they are progressing with their Ogg support (if at all), but have never received a reply...
	:They used to say they were working on it (for the Nex II) but they stopped answering. That was a couple years ago. I don't think they'll ever support Ogg on the Nexia. Sorry. It's a nice player in other regards, though behind the times in terms of hardware performance. It gets about 10 hours of playtime (mp3) on two AA cells where other players get more time than that on one AAA cell.		:They used to say they were working on it (for the Nex II) but they stopped answering. That was a couple years ago. I don't think they'll ever support Ogg on the Nexia. Sorry. It's a nice player in other regards, though behind the times in terms of hardware performance. It gets about 10 hours of playtime (mp3) on two AA cells where other players get more time than that on one AAA cell.
		+
		+	== Vorbis encoder location ==
		+
		+	I added a link to VLSI Solution's VS1053, which is capable of both encoding and decoding Ogg Vorbis with a 16-bit DSP. As far as I know this is a somewhat unique feature and I thought of bumping the on reference up.
		+
		+	However, as I am affiliated with the company, I feel a conflict of interests, so I will not do that. But just in case some of you more independent people think hardware Ogg Vorbis encoders are interesting enough, I wanted to raise a discussion whether it would be ok to move the VS1053 to a more visible position on this page. Again, I will not do that personally.
		+
		+	(I have no idea whether raising this question in itself is a violation of something. I don't think so, but if I'm wrong, please just delete this discussion point.)

Ingmar: removed obsolete entries

2005-09-15T09:17:01Z

removed obsolete entries

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:17, 15 September 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:
	The page is 8.5 screen units to scroll on my 1024px high monitor. Time to reconsider a split of contents as mentioned above?		The page is 8.5 screen units to scroll on my 1024px high monitor. Time to reconsider a split of contents as mentioned above?
	--[[User:Bodo\|Bodo]] 14:49, 29 Sep 2004 (PDT)		--[[User:Bodo\|Bodo]] 14:49, 29 Sep 2004 (PDT)
-
-	~~== Page split ==~~
-
-	~~Hi, anyone else thinks the [[VorbisHardware]] page could be splitted into 4...6 sub pages in order to structure the growing content?~~
-
-	~~What about~~
-	* portable hardware players
-	* static hardware players
-	* third party software in hardware
-	* Projects
-	* Embedded
-
-	~~?? Comments, please!~~
-
-	~~---~~
-
-	~~Now that new Vorbis gadget seem to come in on a weekly basis,~~
-	~~I agree that a page split is inevitable. --ingmar~~
-
-
-	~~== Spam problem ==~~
-
-	~~Guys, these outrageous spam attacks have to stop! It is always the same IP ranges 60.25.x.x. Is there a way to block updates from such IPs in MediaWiki ?~~
-
-	Lately there seems to be some regular expression checks before a post is allowed. It seems that also the term "com" is blocked. How are we supposed links to companies if "com" is forbidden ? Also I can't access the site anymore with my beloved Opera, and it takes ages with other browsers. Is this related somehow ?
-
-	I just did a test (on the Sandbox page) and linking to "www.vorbis.com" worked fine - could you be more specific about what is being disallowed? I've noticed the slowdown as well - I'll ask the relevent people to look into it.
-
-	Update: we've looked into the slowdown problem, and it should now be fixed (it was a strange redirect loop). It looks like this was probably also what made Opera not work at all, so you should be able to use that now (we don't have opera, though, so we didn't test that).
-
-	~~Ok, it works now again. Thanks.~~

	== product description scheme ==		== product description scheme ==