Talk:OggUVS - Revision history

Martin.leese: /* zip */ Response

2008-01-26T20:31:15Z

zip: Response

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:31, 26 January 2008
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:: Or in windows it's possible to view thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.		:: Or in windows it's possible to view thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.
	:: (Creating a zip file is very easy, the average user can do it.)		:: (Creating a zip file is very easy, the average user can do it.)
		+
		+	:::ZIP compression (also called LZII and flate/deflate) was designed to compress English language text. It works poorly on video data. Also, to display the thumbnails you see in Windows, the operating system decompresses the ZIP file without you asking. Same with GIMP. [[User:Martin.leese\|Martin Leese]] 12:31, 26 January 2008 (PST)

2008-01-26T14:28:36Z

Will this thing be lossy or lossless?

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 26 January 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	It's neither. It's uncompressed and raw. You may consider it lossless if it helps you understand.--Ivo		It's neither. It's uncompressed and raw. You may consider it lossless if it helps you understand.--Ivo
		+	:Thanks

	== zip ==		== zip ==

2008-01-26T14:28:08Z

zip

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:28, 26 January 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:: I mean the encapsulating ogg file that could be zipped and played to create relatively small playable video's.		:: I mean the encapsulating ogg file that could be zipped and played to create relatively small playable video's.
	:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.		:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.
-	:: Or in windows it's possible to ~~have~~ thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.	+	:: Or in windows it's possible to view thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.
	:: (Creating a zip file is very easy, the average user can do it.)		:: (Creating a zip file is very easy, the average user can do it.)

2008-01-26T14:27:25Z

zip

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:27, 26 January 2008
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.		:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.
	:: Or in windows it's possible to have thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.		:: Or in windows it's possible to have thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.
		+	:: (Creating a zip file is very easy, the average user can do it.)

2008-01-26T14:26:43Z

zip

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:26, 26 January 2008
Line 20:		Line 20:
	:: I mean the encapsulating ogg file that could be zipped and played to create relatively small playable video's.		:: I mean the encapsulating ogg file that could be zipped and played to create relatively small playable video's.
	:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.		:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.
		+	:: Or in windows it's possible to have thumbnails of images in a zip file without uncompressing it first.

2008-01-26T14:25:44Z

zip

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:25, 26 January 2008
Line 17:		Line 17:

	:OggUVS is not for the common user. Rather it is for video editors and cameras. It's not the "FLAC of video".--Ivo		:OggUVS is not for the common user. Rather it is for video editors and cameras. It's not the "FLAC of video".--Ivo
		+
		+	:: I mean the encapsulating ogg file that could be zipped and played to create relatively small playable video's.
		+	:: Because it's also possible in Gimp to transparantly use zip files.

2008-01-25T17:41:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 25 January 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Will this thing be lossy or lossless? ==		== Will this thing be lossy or lossless? ==
		+
		+	It's neither. It's uncompressed and raw. You may consider it lossless if it helps you understand.--Ivo

	== zip ==		== zip ==
	Could zipping (compressing it in a zip archive) provide a meaningful way of compressing OggUVS to relative small files that can be played?		Could zipping (compressing it in a zip archive) provide a meaningful way of compressing OggUVS to relative small files that can be played?
		+
		+	:OggUVS is not for the common user. Rather it is for video editors and cameras. It's not the "FLAC of video".--Ivo

2008-01-25T17:23:01Z

zip

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:23, 25 January 2008
Line 12:		Line 12:

	== zip ==		== zip ==
-	Could zipping provide a meaningful way of compressing OggUVS to relative small files that can be played?	+	Could zipping (compressing it in a zip archive) provide a meaningful way of compressing OggUVS to relative small files that can be played?

2008-01-25T17:22:38Z

added question

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 25 January 2008
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Will this thing be lossy or lossless? ==		== Will this thing be lossy or lossless? ==
		+
		+	== zip ==
		+	Could zipping provide a meaningful way of compressing OggUVS to relative small files that can be played?

2008-01-25T17:04:13Z

added question

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:04, 25 January 2008
Line 8:		Line 8:

	The distinction between shutter rate and field rate has not been made clear. It is possible, and not uncommon, to issue two fields from the same sample interval separately. It is also possible to have no shutter at all, and for every pixel to be sampled in a different time interval. Be careful to note the common case where the actual shutter is 24Hz, but the effective shutter rate needs to be declared as 25Hz to be consistent with the audio track and the field rate. --[[User:Gumboot\|Gumboot]] 07:01, 19 Nov 2005 (PST)		The distinction between shutter rate and field rate has not been made clear. It is possible, and not uncommon, to issue two fields from the same sample interval separately. It is also possible to have no shutter at all, and for every pixel to be sampled in a different time interval. Be careful to note the common case where the actual shutter is 24Hz, but the effective shutter rate needs to be declared as 25Hz to be consistent with the audio track and the field rate. --[[User:Gumboot\|Gumboot]] 07:01, 19 Nov 2005 (PST)
		+
		+	== Will this thing be lossy or lossless? ==