Talk:Ambisonics
From XiphWiki
(del spam) |
Martin.leese (Talk | contribs) m (→Not for Delete: Formatting) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{delete}} | + | == Not for Delete == |
| + | |||
| + | I deleted the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template, so thought I had better | ||
| + | explain why. I have joined this Wiki because it looks like you guys have an | ||
| + | interest in Ambisonics. I can help with this. However, I need you to tell | ||
| + | me what you are looking for from Ambisonics. For the moment, I have listed | ||
| + | some resources on Ambisonics, and included a short discussion on how the Ogg | ||
| + | formats could improve on the | ||
| + | [http://www.ambisonicbootlegs.net/Members/mleese/file-format-for-b-format/ ".amb"] | ||
| + | and | ||
| + | [http://www.ambisonicbootlegs.net/Members/mleese/file-format-for-uhj/ ".uhj"] | ||
| + | specifications. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ambisonics is mentioned on the [[OggPCM]] page, and I have made some minor | ||
| + | edits to that page. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please let me know what else would be useful to you. [[User:Martin.leese|Martin Leese]] 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : I believe the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template used on a discussion page indicates only that ''discussion'' page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. [[User:Imalone|Imalone]] 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Actually, both the article ''and'' Talk page had the <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki> template on them. I deleted both <nowiki>{{delete}}</nowiki>s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. [[User:Martin.leese|Martin Leese]] 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Resources == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hey, Martin. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--[[User:Saoshyant|Saoshyant]] 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST) | ||
Latest revision as of 14:43, 10 April 2012
Not for Delete
I deleted the {{delete}} template, so thought I had better explain why. I have joined this Wiki because it looks like you guys have an interest in Ambisonics. I can help with this. However, I need you to tell me what you are looking for from Ambisonics. For the moment, I have listed some resources on Ambisonics, and included a short discussion on how the Ogg formats could improve on the ".amb" and ".uhj" specifications.
Ambisonics is mentioned on the OggPCM page, and I have made some minor edits to that page.
Please let me know what else would be useful to you. Martin Leese 22:14, 27 January 2007 (PST)
- I believe the {{delete}} template used on a discussion page indicates only that discussion page should be deleted as it has been created by a spammer. Obviously doesn't matter now that there's real content here, but I don't think it was a proposal to delete the ambisonics page itself. Imalone 05:34, 27 March 2007 (PDT)
Actually, both the article and Talk page had the {{delete}} template on them. I deleted both {{delete}}s. My comments above were meant to be about the article; obviously I should have made that clearer. Martin Leese 22:23, 27 March 2007 (PDT)
Resources
Hey, Martin.
I've put a link to Richard Lee's index of stuff related with Ambisonics, however I have no time to check its details to explain in our article here what a user can find there. If you do not mind, and have the time, please do so. I think the more resources, the better.--Saoshyant 06:42, 2 March 2007 (PST)
