Icebreaker::UserWantedFeatures: Difference between revisions

From XiphWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
m (→‎Compatibility: icecast => Icecast + tidy)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== List of features demanded by Users ==
{{historical}}
== List of features requested by Users ==
 
=== GUI ===
 
I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface.
I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat.
 
=== Compatibility ===
 
I don't know a lot about the internals from Icecast and the like, but it would be really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder. (Have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/) I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality.
 
Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if that is in your interest.


=== I/O ===
=== I/O ===


  - XSPF playlist output format
  - XSPF playlist output format by default
  - [[http://amarok.kde.org]] compatibility for song collections ?
  - Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org) compatibility => XSPF as input format
 
- generation of xml config file for Ices


=== Scheduling ===
=== Scheduling ===


  - hourly news / logo / commercial support
  - hourly news / logo / commercial support
- scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...)
[[Category:Icebreaker]]

Latest revision as of 12:08, 19 February 2016

List of features requested by Users

GUI

I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface. I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat.

Compatibility

I don't know a lot about the internals from Icecast and the like, but it would be really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder. (Have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/) I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality.

Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if that is in your interest.

I/O

- XSPF playlist output format by default
- Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org) compatibility => XSPF as input format
- generation of xml config file for Ices

Scheduling

- hourly news / logo / commercial support
- scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...)