Difference between revisions of "Icebreaker::UserWantedFeatures"

From XiphWiki
Jump to: navigation, search
 
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Icebreaker::UserWantedFeatures ==
+
{{historical}}
 +
== List of features requested by Users ==
 +
 
 +
=== GUI ===
 +
 
 +
I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface.
 +
I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat.
 +
 
 +
=== Compatibility ===
 +
 
 +
I don't know a lot about the internals from icecast and the like, but it would be
 +
really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder.
 +
(have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/)
 +
I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users
 +
with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality.
 +
Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to
 +
abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if
 +
that is in your interest.
  
 
=== I/O ===
 
=== I/O ===
  
  - XSPF playlist output format
+
  - XSPF playlist output format by default
  - [[http://amarok.kde.org|Amarok]] compatibility for song collections ?
+
  - Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org) compatibility => XSPF as input format
 +
 
 +
- generation of xml config file for Ices
  
 
=== Scheduling ===
 
=== Scheduling ===
  
 
  - hourly news / logo / commercial support
 
  - hourly news / logo / commercial support
 +
- scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...)
 +
 +
[[Category:Icebreaker]]

Latest revision as of 16:04, 3 February 2008

This page is currently inactive and is kept primarily for historical interest.

List of features requested by Users

GUI

I think an interesting alternative for a GUI would be a XUL interface. I once saw a XUL interface for the Amarok music collection, and it was very neat.

Compatibility

I don't know a lot about the internals from icecast and the like, but it would be really cool if it would be possible to use your software with StreamTranscoder. (have a look at this: http://www.oddsock.org/tools/streamTranscoderV3/) I think it's important to be able to split up streams, f.ex. to offer users with a low bandwidth a resampled stream with a lower quality. Though, the problem is, if you want to be compatible you propably will have to abandon any direct interaction with the actual streaming server, and i don't know if that is in your interest.

I/O

- XSPF playlist output format by default
- Amarok (http://amarok.kde.org) compatibility => XSPF as input format
- generation of xml config file for Ices

Scheduling

- hourly news / logo / commercial support
- scheduling differents playlists at different timeboxes (e.g. dub from 8-10, rock from 10-12, ...)